Market Commentary on Upgrading

Near Term Performance: Still the Best Way to Select Funds

June 16, 2010 · Leave a Comment

DAL President Janet Brown is a contributor to the Forbes Investor Team blog, Intelligent Investor. The following was excerpted from her post, Staying Local with Your Funds.

Many investors focus on long term performance records when selecting mutual funds. I believe investors are better off choosing funds by near-term performance because the funds that have done well over the near-term tend to do well in ensuing months, a phenomenon called ‘persistence of performance’.

Our research shows that the longer term the performance period was, the less predictive it was. According to our most recent study: even including 2008’s brutal declines, our combination of using an average of a fund’s trailing 1, 3, 6, and 12-month returns still led to higher returns than selecting funds by their 3 or 5 year records.

(Click on the chart to see it in a larger format.)

For this 10+ year time period ending 8/31/2009, a portfolio that invested based on a fund’s 1, 3, 6, and 12-month returns produced 8.06% annualized, while investing in the funds with the top 3-year returns only gained an annual 2.23%. Using trailing 5-year records to select funds returned just 1.34% annualized. All of these Upgraded portfolios beat the market, however: the S&P 500 had an annualized return of negative 0.2% for this time period.

The chart only looks at the last 10+ years, but it reflects what we’ve experienced over the past 40 years and what academic research has confirmed: near term mutual fund performance is predictive.

But while near term performance can tell us where to invest now, it can’t predict how long the current trend will last and it doesn’t forecast future market changes. Following near term performance over time leads to better performance, but it doesn’t always outperform. No system can promise that.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Managers’ Special Report

June 7, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Each month, DAL Investment Company’s team of portfolio managers provides the following commentary.

You’ll learn:

What we’re buying and selling and how portfolios are being re-positioned.

Guidelines for allocating among core and speculative equity funds.
Learn how we at DAL create portfolios, including:

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Managers Special Report

Managers’ Special Report: Buys & Sells – Core Equity Funds

June 7, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Based on data from June 4, 2010

Core equity funds (Class 3 for newsletter subscribers)

2010 has been a volatile year so far, but market leadership trends have been clear and consistent. We have been rapidly reducing exposure to foreign funds all year, and as of this month, our core holdings are 100% domestic. Most of our core positions remain highly ranked, and as we upgrade the few laggards, we continue to add to diversified mid-cap and mid-cap value funds and ETFs.

We want to emphasize that we have no forecast for currencies or the international versus domestic economy. Our portfolios benefited from holding significant foreign fund positions over the past years, but we have also benefited from selling foreign funds that have fallen in our rankings. Just as leadership changed from growth in the late 1990s to value in the first part of the 21st century, followed by an extended period of leadership from foreign funds, our greatest conviction is that fund leadership will continue to change over time. For now, our highest ranked core funds are primarily mid-cap and value funds.

Summary: leadership among core equity funds remains focused on domestic mid-cap and especially mid-cap value funds and ETFs.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Buys & Sells · Core Equity Funds (Class 3) · Managers Special Report

Managers’ Special Report: Buys & Sells – Speculative Equity Funds

June 7, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Based on data from June 4, 2010

Speculative equity funds (Class 1 and 2  for newsletter subscribers)

We had very little turnover among speculative funds this month. Our ETF-only portfolios were prompted to reduce exposure to equities in favor of a modest position in an ETF that invests in physical gold. Otherwise, our speculative holdings remain mostly small cap funds and ETFs and some mid-cap growth funds and ETFs. Even among speculative funds, our holdings are now 100% domestic.

Summary: Our speculative holdings are 100% domestic, emphasizing smaller companies. Our ETF-only portfolios are slightly different this month because those portfolios hold a small position in a physical gold ETF.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Buys & Sells · Managers Special Report · Speculative Equity Funds (Class 1 and 2)

Managers’ Special Report: Buys & Sells – Flexible Income Funds

June 7, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Based on data from June 4, 2010

We have enjoyed relatively low turnover in our Flexible Income portfolios lately, but this month we are selling floating rate bonds and our low volatility Class 4 positions in favor of more traditional bond funds. We had lightened up on high yield bond funds after last year’s terrific run, and we are slightly increasing exposure now to capitalize on the recent pullback. We purchased an ETF so we can remain flexible. We are also adding to more traditional intermediate term bond funds.

Our Flexible Income portfolios remain broadly diversified including very conservative short-term treasury funds and ETFs and limited exposure to more aggressive high-yield bond funds and ETFs. Our only foreign bond fund exposure is with a fund that hedges currency exposure back to the US dollar.

We recognize that bond yields are low and will start to rise at some point. The question is when and from what level? Presently, investors appear more concerned about risk than inflation. We remain flexible and our methods objective so that we can adapt as leadership changes. As with equities, the key to long-term success in fixed income is being alert to and aligned with what is working, even if what’s working feels out of sync with what we might forecast or expect. Meaningful trend changes last long enough to give us the luxury of waiting until evidence of the change emerges in our observations.

Summary: Our Flexible Income portfolios are broadly diversified. We modestly increased our position in high-yield bond funds and ETFs to capitalize on recent weakness and also added to intermediate term bond funds. Our portfolio duration remains shorter than the benchmark total bond index.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Buys & Sells · Flexible Income · Managers Special Report

Managers’ Special Report: Tactical Model Perspective

June 7, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Based on data from June 4 , 2010

Prior to the correction, we observed that investors were too complacent and stock prices were gaining faster than underlying fundamentals (see past comments below). Now, investor pessimism has reached an extreme that suggests that many of those who are willing to sell their stocks may have already done so. Also, while our measures do not suggest that stocks are under-valued, we no longer measure stocks as over-valued. So the recent sell-off may become something more ominous, but we can clearly observe that it has already “corrected” many of the concerns that had held us to a fully defensive posture.

Our trend analysis is neutral at this time. Obviously, trend strength is under pressure. Still, most market indexes remain in up-trends. The easiest way to observe this is by looking at the direction of the 200-day moving averages. When a large percentage of market indexes and mutual funds are priced below their intermediate-term moving averages and the averages continue to slope upwards and to the right, that fact indicates that the market is “oversold”. If the selling continues, the moving averages will roll over indicating a confirmed change in market trend. Absent further deterioration, it is dangerous to bet against an oversold market, especially when accompanied by extreme investor pessimism.

We must be willing to take some risks at times, even when concerns remain, if we hope to participate in market gains. We prefer to make incremental changes and establish clear limits and triggers so we don’t get stuck in or out of the market. Presently, the weight of the evidence warrants moderate equity exposure and a willingness to add exposure to highly ranked funds and ETFs on weakness as long as the major indexes continue to hold support levels and the intermediate term trend remains positive. We have no forecast for near-term market direction. We continue to hold some cash and take advantage of modest hedging techniques to allow us to manage risk while we monitor for renewed trend strength or weakness.

We acknowledge that many investors are more comfortable investing in our fully invested portfolios and managing risk through asset allocation. For “do-it-yourself” investors, we believe that asset allocation is the most practical and certainly the easiest way to effectively manage risk. If any of our readers have questions or concerns about risk management, we hope that they will call us as we are happy to help.

Our tactical portfolios are designed to take a more active approach to risk management. Our goal with these portfolios is to earn more in advances than we lose in declines and therefore to add value over time. Of course, we risk being invested when the market declines and being hedged when the market advances. We are committed to managing these risks, but they are part of any tactical investment strategy.  The most important element to long-term investment success is that you understand the risk, reward potential and philosophy of your investment strategy and remain disciplined and focused on your long-term goals.

Summary: The market indexes have suffered their first true correction (peak-to-trough loss of 10% or more) since the March 2009 lows and are struggling to hold support. On balance, our models are more bullish than they have been for some time. Our trend model is neutral. Our tactical portfolios have weathered the recent storm with minimal damage. We are cautiously more bullish and although we are not fully invested, we are allowing for the possibility that the correction will give way to a continuation of the recent bull market.

Summary: The market indexes have suffered their first true correction (peak-to-trough loss of 10% or more) since the March 2009 lows and are struggling to hold support. On balance, our models are more bullish than they have been for some time. Our trend model is neutral. Our tactical portfolios have weathered the recent storm with minimal damage. We are cautiously more bullish and although we are not fully invested, we are allowing for the possibility that the correction will give way to a continuation of the recent bull market.

Prior to the correction, we observed that investors were too complacent and stock prices were gaining faster than underlying fundamentals (see past comments below. Now, investor pessimism has reached an extreme that suggests that many of those who are willing to sell their stocks may have already done so. Also, while our measures do not suggest that stocks are under-valued, we no longer measure stocks as over-valued. So the recent selloff may become something more ominous, but we can clearly observe that it has already “corrected” many of the concerns that had held us to a fully defensive posture.

Our trend analysis is neutral at this time. Obviously, trend strength is under pressure. Still, most market indexes remain in uptrends. The easiest way to observe this is by looking at the direction of the 200-day moving averages. When a large percentage of market indexes and mutual funds are priced below their intermediate-term moving averages and the averages continue to slope upwards and to the right, that fact indicates that the market is “oversold”. If the selling continues, the moving averages will roll over indicating a confirmed change in market trend. Absent further deterioration, it is dangerous to bet against an oversold market, especially when accompanied by extreme investor pessimism.

We must be willing to take some risks at times, even when concerns remain, if we hope to participate in market gains. We prefer to make incremental changes and establish clear limits and triggers so we don’t get stuck in or out of the market. Presently, the weight of the evidence warrants moderate equity exposure and a willingness to add exposure to highly ranked funds and ETFs on weakness as long as the major indexes continue to hold support levels and the intermediate term trend remains positive. We have no forecast for near-term market direction. We continue to hold some cash and take advantage of modest hedging techniques to allow us to manage risk while we monitor for renewed trend strength or weakness.

We acknowledge that many investors are more comfortable investing in our fully invested portfolios and managing risk through asset allocation. For “do-it-yourself” investors, we believe that asset allocation is the most practical and certainly the easiest way to effectively manage risk. If any of our readers have questions or concerns about risk management, we hope that they will call us as we are happy to help.

Our tactical portfolios are designed to take a more active approach to risk management. Our goal with these portfolios is to earn more in advances than we lose in declines and therefore to add value over time. Of course, we risk being invested when the market declines and being hedged when the market advances. We are committed to managing these risks, but they are part of any tactical investment strategy.  The most important element to long-term investment success is that you understand the risk, reward potential and philosophy of your investment strategy and remain disciplined and focused on your long-term goals.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Managers Special Report · Tactical Perspective

New Video by NoLoad FundX Newsletter

May 27, 2010 · 1 Comment

We just completed our first web-based educational video geared toward individual investors.  This five minute piece focuses on the Monthly Upgrader Portfolio (MUP) on page 2 of DAL’s monthly investment newsletter, NoLoad FundX.  This step-by-step tool guides viewers through how and why to use the MUP.

We invite you to view the program below:

We welcome your feedback on this new tool. We are developing videos on other topics related to NoLoad FundX and the Upgrading strategy, and would appreciate hearing what topics youd like to see us cover in this on-going series.

Thanks for watching!

See the Most Recent Changes to the Monthly Upgrader Portfolio
New subscribers can sign up for a free 2-month trial subscription. You’ll receive two, free online issues of NoLoad FundX and access to the subscriber section of www.fundx.com. This trial offer is completely free. No credit card information is required.

Click here to sign up for your free 2 month trial subscription.

→ 1 CommentCategories: NoLoad FundX newsletter

Managers’ Special Report: Buys & Sells – Core Equity Funds

May 13, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Based on data from May 11, 2010

Core equity funds (Class 3 for newsletter subscribers)

For the last several months, our rankings have led us to sell foreign funds and buy mid cap domestic funds. The first foreign funds we sold (January and February 2010) were the ETFs that concentrate in developed Europe.  Continued weak foreign performance and relative strength from domestic funds has prompted us to incrementally sell nearly all foreign funds, and our core holdings are now less than 10% in foreign funds. Those few foreign funds we continue to hold are broadly diversified, including exposure to Australia and Canada. While we continue to favor mid-cap stocks, we are also finding persistent leadership from value over growth strategies.

We recognize that some European fund weakness is currency related and that trend may eventually reverse. That said, we have learned in over 40 years of Upgrading that it is best to follow our ranks, investing with the current leaders and selling laggards. We have benefited from holding a global portfolio for much of the past several years, but we have also been rewarded for selling foreign funds when prompted by our ranks.

For more details about how our core holdings have evolved, please see last months’ comments.

Summary: Leadership among core funds is dominated by domestic mid-cap funds and ETFs, especially mid-cap value funds and ETFs.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Buys & Sells · Core Equity Funds (Class 3) · Managers Special Report

Managers’ Special Report: Buys & Sells – Speculative Equity Funds

May 13, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Based on data from May 11, 2010

Speculative equity funds (Classes 1 and 2 for newsletter subscribers)

This month we sold our remaining emerging markets funds and ETFs in favor of domestic small caps. This  trend  began a few months ago, especially among ETF holdings. As recently December 2009, the aggressive component of our portfolios held as much as 50% emerging market funds.  Currently, our speculative holdings are mainly small cap domestic funds, but also include domestic mid-cap growth and micro caps. As with our core holdings, value leads growth investment strategies.

Summary: Our speculative holdings are mainly domestic small cap funds and ETFs, especially small cap value. We also hold micro cap and domestic mid-cap growth ETFs.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Buys & Sells · Managers Special Report · Speculative Equity Funds (Class 1 and 2)

Managers’ Special Report: Buys & Sells – Flexible Income Funds

May 13, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Based on data from May 11, 2010

We made no changes to our Flexible Income portfolios with this month’s upgrades. Our Flexible Income portfolios have enjoyed a good run over the past 12-months and year-to-date, beating the benchmark aggregate bond index handily and earning much higher total returns than one might assume given the current very low yields offered by traditional fixed income. We’ve also enjoyed remarkable stability despite recent volatility in traditional bonds and bond interest rates. We did make a modest shift in the turbulence of early May:  we took advantage of weakness and added 5% to a high-yield bond ETF, reducing our exposure to short-term bond funds.

Our flexible income portfolios remain broadly diversified and maintain a lower average duration than the benchmark. Please see last months’ post for more details about our flexible income holdings.

Summary: Our flexible income portfolios remain broadly diversified and maintain a lower average duration than the benchmark. We had no Upgrades this month but did move to capitalize on weakness in high-yield bonds by increasing exposure modestly in our flexible income portfolios.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Buys & Sells · Flexible Income · Managers Special Report